Sunday, April 19, 2020
The Unbearable Lightness of Being Review Essay Example
The Unbearable Lightness of Being Review Paper Essay on The Unbearable Lightness of Being The opposite of heaviness lightness is the most mysterious and the most very significant of all opposites Milan Kundera writes. The entire novel is the study of what is human life in the trap in which he made the world. Is it hard, this life, there is easy, its not clear. Philosophical insertion of gravity and lightness great. I fell in love with the novel only because of them! Of gravity not bad, easy not good. Sometimes lightness becomes too onerous, and the severity of perceived lightness. Many truths, they envelop the readers own Ã «es muss seinÃ » Ã «There is no way to check, what solution is best, because there is no comparison. We live all the time, and for the first time without training Ã » Kundera wrote his masterful novel:. We read the beginning, then suddenly learn the ending and then transported into the middle. It is easy to get confused, but I love puzzles! Ã°Å¸â¢â The book is lovely, but the topic is not too rare: a study of love and fidelity, a description of the complex and intricate relationships of four people who are like Beethoven quartet Ã «Muss es sein? . Es muss sein Ã » We will write a custom essay sample on The Unbearable Lightness of Being Review specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on The Unbearable Lightness of Being Review specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on The Unbearable Lightness of Being Review specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer According to the plot of the book: Teresa likes of Tomas Tomas loves Teresa but has a lover Sabina (and not only it), he loves Franz Reader envelops many questions as you read. Why Teresa, knowing about infidelity Tomas continues to love him? Why not stop to change Tomas Teresa, though he loves her and knows that hurting her own infidelities? Why prosperous Franz throws for Sabinas wife and daughter, and never ceases to love Sabina when she throws it? Why anyone Sabina does not love all his life running from everyone? For that Karenin so painfully dying? And so on For some questions there is an answer, and some still remain in the thoughts Kundera writes: The heroes of my novel my own ability, which was not given to be fulfilled.. Thats why I love them all equally, and they are all equally appalled me; each of them to overstep the bounds, I just walked around myself. The author reserves his characters freedom of choice, and every reader something of their own. For me, betrayal painful as it is for Teresa. Id probably could not love in spite of, as she does. But there exists and the one for whom the severity of treason and easy life for such a person does not become less beautiful The whole world -. Trap. Each person is perfect and too weak to fight with their weaknesses I am under the impression, thoughts fly Read, because it is something to think of it, there is something to bet there and what to dream! The Unbearable Lightness of Being Review Essay Example The Unbearable Lightness of Being Review Paper Essay on The Unbearable Lightness of Being Unbearable Lightness of Being a fine example of modern intellectual novel, the book is a profound and worthy of all praise. However, its hard to give an unambiguous conclusion about it and about the impression she made on me. So it is necessary to subject it to criticism (which I do not really know how). On the basis of the artistic part of the book is made up of philosophical and psychological essay in which Kundera speaks primarily about the man with his inner feelings and aspirations, his feelings and relationships with . society and other people First of all, after reading a book striking a fact: despite the fact that many insist on calling the Unbearable lightness of being, a book about love, and the concept is it is one of the main , love as such is not there. None of the characters are not like anyone: no wives, husbands and lovers, neither of their parents and children, and, of course, in any case themselves. All the heroes of the natural, sensual and healthy love is replaced by the sado-masochistic attachments, the desire to suppress their complexes, it attempts to self-realization at the expense of a loved one. In light of this fact, it becomes clear why after reading a book inside remains a painful, depressing and sometimes frightening feeling. We will write a custom essay sample on The Unbearable Lightness of Being Review specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on The Unbearable Lightness of Being Review specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on The Unbearable Lightness of Being Review specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer The author took the path of Dr. Frankenstein and molded his characters (giving them, in his own words, their personal features, if not open) from own ideas about man, his inner motives and ways of thinking and interacting with the world. Thus Kundera gave himself the freedom to own thinking, your own set up almost living proof for their own philosophical theses. Analyzing the psychological state of his characters Kundera talks about their childhood and their parents, sends them dreams (in my opinion, is not always similar to the real), it comes up with the problems and circumstances as comfortable for him. Thus, the author of everything converges, except that a living person is much more versatile and not so definitely dependent on any specific factors. It may seem that the author knows almost everything about the man and his interior the world, but this is true only in relation to his characters, since he created them. If you look closely, it becomes clear that all the characters are flawed, not adapted to life in society, are suffering from internal problems and conflicts ravaging them, and as a person is not so deep as it might seem. Kundera chose a dangerous way: while reading a book is usually very dorisovyvaet hero image in his mind, based on the description in the book, the author make out their offspring by cog, dismembered them on complex problems, passions, fears and desires and nothing left. It is for this reason that the closer the book to an end (and the deeper they are analyzed), the more the characters lose their humanity, liveliness. Ironically, comes to mind comparisons with Junkie Burroughs, so It is very heavy on the atmosphere of the book, where almost all the characters do not look at people as we used to see them. However, all the characters in Burroughs asocial, cut off from society and do not want to merge with him, while Kundera describes the everyone: a doctor, a window washer, waitress, photographer, artist, professor and others. And this is even worse, because if everyone around us may be such that these can be and we are. Its scary, especially for those who will believe in the reality of the characters of the book, for those who have already had (albeit fleeting) experience disappointment in human nature, its purity. Unprepared reader and does not have a more or less clear ideas about the inner world of the people around him, this novel may enter into the alarm state and to sow seeds of doubt. (I think I will do some of his principles and dare to give you advice: do not unconditionally trust the au thor in his observations, because its still fiction.) Here lies the danger, but there is no doubt lies and strengths of the book: it makes us look for themselves, their own actions and desires is critical. Just wanted to point out the ending of the novel, it seemed to me not too convincing. Kundera sees a fairly long period of life of his characters, watching their old age. Some sacrificed in advance, making it possible to complete the book at any time. One gets the feeling that the characters do not remain unparsed something to say about them in the long run is nothing more, so it is logical to finish the book. The history of human disease ends or its recovery or death. This book does not recover one, is also not very clear whether it is prepared to the author to put the heroes of any diagnosis. Its hard to say with certainty how he Kundera sees his characters, and whether he was able to fully express his creative ideas. And if we talk about the vision of man and his nature, looming in this book, then with him, I can not agree, and for this I have a lot of bases. Apparently, because of that I could not enjoy reading this novel and I can not say that he loved me unconditionally. But, of course, to deny the reason why this book in its unquestionable cultural significance and call into question its artistic [demon] value would be at least silly.